terribleswedes

He's purely feast or famine. He has just about as many 4 point games as he does 25+ point games over 2021. His averages always work out. So for Roto? Keep him. For H2H: Do you like gambling?

Nurkic has only played 20 games this year. Granted he's been awful in all of them, but he falls under category of injury-related bust, for me. Think Morant/LMA take the cake. Booker was a borderline first rounder who's ranked 61 by Yahoo right now, so that sucks; but he's really rescued his value since the season began, he was in around the century mark earlier this year. I suppose you could throw Simmons in there as some have, but that guy gets overdrafted every year IMO and anybody who thought he'd produce top 25 value has no one to blame but themselves (although even in punt builds he'

Yup, mine's good now too.

In the public Yahoo leagues I'm in, standings have been updated. In the one custom, they haven't. Anybody have guesses about why?

Do you guys remember picking up Olynyk thinking, "Here's the guy who's single-handedly going to win me the rebounds cat in Week 15?" Me neither.

Mainly I just wish we didn't have TWO Ja_en McDanielses to figure out.

Posited: He's fantasy fool's gold this year, will be something else in future years. I was resistant to DMC for so many years because he was very, very bad in three cats, not-good-enough in others. When Cousins started he was awesome with points, rebounds and steals, and eventually got his efficiency cats high enough to make up for his gaudy counting stats. Porter's got 3 steals in 7 games since his breakout, no blocks and his other counting stats are all over the place. He's too hard to drop given his situation, but he only works in certain builds THIS year. What sucks is that

I"m sticking with Ibaka personally but I have the spot on my IR, he makes better sense for my team build, plus Mo/Poku have uncertain situations themselves.

The Paul slander is a bit ridiculous right now and I understand as someone who drafted Booker with my second pick in one league why people are looking for explanations. Paul is making himself anything but the alpha, however, as the usage numbers below show. Booker is still far and away the main usage man in Phoenix, and has literally changed only 1/10th of a percent for the worse. Last year starters: Usg Rubio 22.7 Usg Saric 17.6 This year: Usg Paul 24.4 vs 25.2 Usg Ayton 23.7 vs 19.1 Usg Booker 30.3 vs 30.2 Usg Bridges 12.7 vs 16 Usg Kaminsky 20.8 vs 19.3

I wish I knew the answer to your question. He wasn't in terrible foul trouble the game before (four total, same as prior game), but then next game he got extra minutes against the big Lakers frontline. But when he gets 25+ minutes he tends to be good. I wish they'd just recognize and give up on Tristan Thompson, although maybe there's some basketball reason I'm missing.

I hate you all, I went with Lamb and Wright, and look at what Ellington and Powell did vs them tonight. (Just kidding. I agreed with the call on Lamb, and Wright did aight.)

Anderson, if it's not obvious by now.

I always favor getting the best player in a two-for-two deal but in the case of Doncic, he's barely better than Grant and Schroder is borderline droppable. If you have someone you like on the waiver wire, and feel like you need to make a play on assists, go for it. Otherwise, I'd rather have Grant/Shai.

I probably didn't see this in time, but if it's not too late: LaMelo, Harris, Wright, Theis, Vanderbilt, Anthony, without taking into account any team considerations at all.

If anybody, in either league, I'd say the guys whose names start with De-. Especially Jordan, who hasn't exactly gone crazy with the timeshare ending. I hate carrying less than four centers because I have some open spots sometimes, but some of your guys listed at PF have C eligibility and vice versa. Alternately: Bazley, although as I type this he's having a decent game. Obviously not sure which one I'd pick if I only had to pick one, given my prior conundrum. Detroit makes very little sense to me rn.