Jump to content
NBC Sports Edge Forums

Hanghow

Established Members
  • Content Count

    772
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

423 Excellent

About Hanghow

  • Rank
    Allstar
  • Birthday 10/11/1982

Previous Fields

  • Add to Mailing List?
    No

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Location
    Toledo, OH

Recent Profile Visitors

2,302 profile views
  1. Depends on the options but I'd definitely keep May over him at this point.
  2. Ew no. Do not give up Wander in a dynasty unless you're getting like a top-20 dynasty player back and, for the love of god, get competing offers from other teams. This guy isn't the only one interested in the top overall prospect.
  3. Gausman and Musgrove are both excellent choices. I'd stay away from Price; with him missing last year, who knows what you're getting? As for Manning, he's a young pitcher so he could disappoint or he could get hurt, so why mortgage your chance to win now? Many of these dynasty leagues overvalue young players; bank the good years from Musgrove or Gausman.
  4. I don't understand vetoing a trade and keeping both managers. If a trade's getting vetoed, surely one of the managers needs to be banned from the league.
  5. Yeah, trade looks completely fine to me. Surely the league has and/or will see worse deals than that at some point.
  6. Being open to change is great, but getting 12+ people to agree to make even the smallest changes is a gigantic pain; no chance I'd try to move platforms. If we were starting over, I'd be happy to give Fantrax a shot, but if you have a long-surviving dynasty league, you learn not to rock the boat too much.
  7. Sometimes "fast" just means over a tiny sample... he has an xwOBA better than Machado, Eloy, Gallo, and a bunch of other well-regarded bats since the start of 2019, plus he plays catcher.
  8. Saw your new post; I'm also repping Acuna/Soto/Robert/Bichette/deGrom in a keeper; feels good lol.
  9. I can't imagine who else would be there at #2 that would be more valuable than Robert, if he's allowed to fall to pick #2.
  10. Yes, they're trading picks. Is trading picks allowed or not?
  11. Both "over-rated" and "under-rated" are kind of stupid. They're very generally a little useful, but they're entirely irrelevant when you're discussing a player's value with another person. You basically end up making some message board commenter a stand-in for every fantasy writer hack you have a grudge against.
  12. We are looking for a manager to take over the team linked below: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BdqrTD9_RV9PoPV0OAXMcUn3j2MqV93oNPieMOuGId4/edit?usp=sharing We are a deep keeper, where teams keep 20 Major Leaguers and 20 Minor Leaguers every year. We have been in continuous operation since 2007. Scoring is H2H with categories as follows: Hitters: R 2B 3B HR RBI SB BB AVG A Pitchers: IP W CG K SV HLD GIDP ERA WHIP Please let me know if you're interested or have any questions.
  13. My reading is that these statements are directly contradictory. This, not incidentally, is why you're having trouble getting ESPN to do this without duct taping a convoluted solution together.
  14. Look, man, 56 games is what we got. I don't know what you want me to do about a weird 2020. Robert slaughtered the minors right through AAA; Bohm did the same but only got to AA by 2020. Regardless, Bohm doesn't have anywhere near the ceiling that Robert does. Even with Bohm putting up that OPS+ number in a small sample, Robert outdid him in Baseball Savant's XWOBACON .432 to .391, which incorporates Statcast data. Bohm is a potential solid bat while Robert is a potential stud. I stand by my response, though will admit I may have under-estimated Bohm a bit.
  15. I don't get selling a young high upside player who's done it in MLB for a younger high upside player who hasn't. Stick with Robert.
×
×
  • Create New...