golden eagles 137 Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 I'm in a FAAB league with a $100 budget for the regular season. There is a maximum limit of 4 RBs/WRs allowed on our rosters. My WRs now are Wes Welker, Andre Johnson and Malcolm Floyd... And now Brandon Tate. I put in a $5 bid for Brandon Tate and acquired him. I think that he has more upside then Knox. Knox hasn't really impressed me so far. Tate immediately steps into starting with Moss gone. NE had to see something in this kid that allowed them to pull the trigger on the Moss trade.. Any opinions? Pass or Fail.. Link to post Share on other sites
bloc8888 22 Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 I'm in a FAAB league with a $100 budget for the regular season.There is a maximum limit of 4 RBs/WRs allowed on our rosters. My WRs now are Wes Welker, Andre Johnson and Malcolm Floyd... And now Brandon Tate. I put in a $5 bid for Brandon Tate and acquired him. I think that he has more upside then Knox. Knox hasn't really impressed me so far. Tate immediately steps into starting with Moss gone. NE had to see something in this kid that allowed them to pull the trigger on the Moss trade.. Any opinions? Pass or Fail.. I like. Knox is more proven, so it's a slight risk, but given what Knox has shown thus far (and your other 3 WRs) no point not to take a little risk for some upside. Tate's value could start to rise w/ Moss gone obviously... though the next game or two will tell the tale. Decent flyer though (he went for $1 in my league out of $100)... Help with mine? http://forums.rotoworld.com/index.php?showtopic=198115 Link to post Share on other sites
golden eagles 137 Posted October 6, 2010 Author Share Posted October 6, 2010 bump Link to post Share on other sites
poopdungbeatle 346 Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 Not a horrible move. I have both Tate and Knox. I'd rather have Knox. I used my #9 Wavier to get tate...surprised i got him. But if i dropped Knox, someone would use a much higher waiver priortiy to get him. Link to post Share on other sites
ponchsox 1,800 Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 It's a risky move but a potentially good move. Knox will be more consistent week to week but Tate will have a few big games. Link to post Share on other sites
golden eagles 137 Posted October 6, 2010 Author Share Posted October 6, 2010 yo! Link to post Share on other sites
NYSportsfan24 39 Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 I like Tate. http://forums.rotoworld.com/index.php?showtopic=198213 Link to post Share on other sites
Pacochu 2 Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 I think Tate is in the better offense, and with your screwy roster system, it makes sense. Link to post Share on other sites
BrokerFCT 10 Posted October 6, 2010 Share Posted October 6, 2010 I'd rather have Knox. Tate isn't going to jump into Moss production... or even close to it Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.