DrRazvi 12 Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 Here are two teams and where they stand. Several people in the league have voiced opposition to this deal. Need some neutral advice on whether I should allow it or not. 12 team.. .33PPR (top 6 make playoffs) Team A: 5-6 (7th place - fighting for a playoff berth) QB: Eli, Freeman RB: AP, Spiller, Felix WR: Calvin, Welker, Lloyd, Antonio Brown TE: Miller, Olsen Team B: 3-8 (11th place - out of contention) QB: Payton WR: Bowe, Djax, MWilliams, Hartline RB: Alf, Sproles, Pierre, Redman TE: Gronk Team A is offering Felix+Olsen+Lloyd to team B for Alfred Morris. The rationale is that Olsen will replace gronk, and Lloyd is an upgrade at WR for Team B. The concern is that Team B will be very thin at RB with Fragile (backup) Felix this week and going forward. There is also concern that Team B is apathetic because he is out of contention. Dwayne Allen and Keller are both viable FA options. I hate to veto trades, but there is alot of disapproval about this, especially from the other bubble teams. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Link to post Share on other sites
dwetzel115 39 Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 I think the trade is fair,if anything Team A is giving up too much. As long as its fair you have to let it go. I understand the other bubble teams are mad because it is going to help a guy chasing them for the last spot. Ask the guys in 1st and 2nd what they think because its not them he is going after but I say its more than fair. Only true one sided deals get vetoed. Also its not your job to worry about a teams health going forward as is your arguement about felix. Link to post Share on other sites
MrArmageddon 204 Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 I think it's fair. It looks like team A is overpaying a little for to bolster his lineup for a playoff push. There's no more byes or anything so no need for him to worry about depth. Link to post Share on other sites
metsfan692 2 Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 Its fair, team B is getting the better end of the trade, but not by enough that it should be vetoed Link to post Share on other sites
rpchudgar 21 Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 No way...should never veto unless its straight up collusion. Link to post Share on other sites
kpanghmc 1 Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 There's no evidence of collusion here. The trade is actually fairly reasonable in terms of player values. Do not veto. Link to post Share on other sites
Beto666 24 Posted November 21, 2012 Share Posted November 21, 2012 Fair. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.