golden eagles 137 Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 1 PPR league Am I crazy to offer up my Yeldon for Woodhead? I have Ingram, Mason/Gurley combo as well on my roster. Link to post Share on other sites
Nick777777777 27 Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 Personally I would rather have woodhead Link to post Share on other sites
Steadfripp 23 Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 In PPR, definitely Woodhead. Thanks for your help Link to post Share on other sites
THE HOUND 23 Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 I don't think the Woodhead owner would take that trade especially in PPR. Link to post Share on other sites
Solbester 28 Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 woodhead for ppr. hes more consistent. all depends on the defense they are playing against. http://forums.rotoworld.com/index.php?showtopic=540121 Link to post Share on other sites
Trifecta 2,133 Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 Woodhead for me as well. Link to post Share on other sites
eab99 10 Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 Woodhead for sure Link to post Share on other sites
GottaGetTheWin 2,291 Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 I mean Woodhead was the RB13 in 2013 with Matthews there so it isn't crazy for him to be a PPR Rb2. Yeldon will have more volume though. I think I'd stick with Woodhead. If he is getting red zone carries then I think he mas more TD chances than Yeldon. Jags are bad.. http://forums.rotoworld.com/index.php?showtopic=540148 Link to post Share on other sites
golden eagles 137 Posted September 17, 2015 Author Share Posted September 17, 2015 Trade was accepted. I received Woodhead for Yeldon. Thanks for help everybody. Link to post Share on other sites
Rush2112 4,272 Posted September 17, 2015 Share Posted September 17, 2015 Woody and its not even close. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.