Experienced Rookie 662 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 10 hours ago, Chwf3rd said: Still doesn't seem totally sustainable to me but I'll take it. Why not? He's done it every damn week so far. How many weeks in a row does a guy need to go double digits before you believe? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
joshua18 7,029 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 11 minutes ago, Experienced Rookie said: Why not? He's done it every damn week so far. How many weeks in a row does a guy need to go double digits before you believe? He'll wait until wk 10 at DEN, start him then, and then refuse to do so ROS claiming fantasy is "too unpredictable". ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
disasterisk 1,267 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 34 minutes ago, ponchsox said: Riiiiiiight. Just like if you took away Kareem Hunt’s big runs, right? Again, a question was asked and I answered it. That does not mean I agree with the people who doubt his WR1 status. Try and keep up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chwf3rd 1,624 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Experienced Rookie said: Why not? He's done it every damn week so far. How many weeks in a row does a guy need to go double digits before you believe? 52 minutes ago, joshua18 said: He'll wait until wk 10 at DEN, start him then, and then refuse to do so ROS claiming fantasy is "too unpredictable". ? Right now he's on pace for: 118 targets + 73/921/16. Which number seems like the outlier there? Edited October 6, 2017 by Chwf3rd Quote Link to post Share on other sites
joshua18 7,029 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 3 minutes ago, Chwf3rd said: Right now he's on pace for: 118 targets + 73/921/16. Which number seems like the outlier there? The 921, given that he hasn't even gotten any long TDs so far and he led the NFL in yards per catch last year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JSA2422 1,604 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 3 minutes ago, Chwf3rd said: Right now he's on pace for: 118 targets + 73/921/16. Which number seems like the outlier there? the yards, should be higher .. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Singing in Dwayne 313 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, Chwf3rd said: Right now he's on pace for: 118 targets + 73/921/16. Which number seems like the outlier there? Take out the first game versus the Chiefs and Peters, the only game where Brady threw under 300 yards and no TDs. Then what's his projection look like? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ponchsox 1,800 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 We can argue whether or not he's a WR1 all day but all I know is he isn't leaving my lineup. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
furbz420 610 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 12 minutes ago, Chwf3rd said: Right now he's on pace for: 118 targets + 73/921/16. Which number seems like the outlier there? The yards look like the clear outlier to me, especially when you consider Hogan hasn't really caught many deep balls this year and I believe he led the league in average depth of target last year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chwf3rd 1,624 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 14 minutes ago, Singing in Dwayne said: Take out the first game versus the Chiefs and Peters, the only game where Brady threw under 300 yards and no TDs. Then what's his projection look like? Good point. Without the first game he projects for about 88/1150. Still doesnt seem totally sustainable to me but no nobody is going to pay me his value so the point's mute. I see him like Davante Adams. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
yahyahtrick 532 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 If only Brady hits him on that throw in the fourth quarter to ice the game, Hogan was wide open. Brady missed cause he was pressured and had to let it go sooner than he'd like but it would have been a 40+ yard TD. 9 rec / 120ish yards / 2 TD. This thread would have exploded. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
joshua18 7,029 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 8 minutes ago, ponchsox said: We can argue whether or not he's a WR1 all day but all I know is he isn't leaving my lineup. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
beerfish 455 Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Locked and loaded against the Jets with a gimpy Brady? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JSA2422 1,604 Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Just now, beerfish said: Locked and loaded against the Jets with a gimpy Brady? yes... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chrismikayla 75 Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 8 minutes ago, beerfish said: Locked and loaded against the Jets with a gimpy Brady? Yes sir. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TennisMenace 777 Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 Well let me see..... Hogan or Martavis? Hogan or Injured Diggs? Hogan or Injured Corey Davis? You know my decision. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
biggquis 138 Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 (edited) Top 10 receiver at end of season, no questions asked. Watch. The fact that their D sucks will see to that. He's not even being asked to go deep yet. Edited October 13, 2017 by biggquis Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kempimus Prime 137 Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 WR1 this week and ROS Quote Link to post Share on other sites
disasterisk 1,267 Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 On 10/6/2017 at 8:38 AM, joshua18 said: On 10/6/2017 at 9:44 AM, ponchsox said: Riiiiiiight. Just like if you took away Kareem Hunt’s big runs, right? And here we are. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
InVINCEable 130 Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Just traded for him two days ago. What happened???... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lbjames6 2,700 Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 He had the looks, just couldn't get luck on his side. Box score readers will freak out, people that watched won't. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blight 40 Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 1 hour ago, lbjames6 said: He had the looks, just couldn't get luck on his side. Box score readers will freak out, people that watched won't. Yep. He tried, Brady tried. Just wasn't happening today. It happens. As a Hogan owner, I don't feel the need to consider benching him on account of this one game. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jimithing11 675 Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 4 hours ago, InVINCEable said: Just traded for him two days ago. What happened???... Brady looked terrible for most of the game. His usage is odd week-to-week. Last week, he was a volume player running short/intermediate routes. Every time I looked today it felt like he was running something deep down the field or a deep crossing route. The high-percentage work wasn't there Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TennisMenace 777 Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 Who would have thought Trading Thielen to get Hogan may not work out for me. Hogan has Brady Thielen has Keenum. wow!!!!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ponchsox 1,800 Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 Chris Cooper Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.