Jump to content
NBC Sports Edge Forums

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, jhsong916 said:

don't agree on Booker being shut down, but still I like this trade. actually not Veto-worthy imo but it is still you get the better deal on this one


if the league is competitive, how is this not veto worthy? at a 3 for 2 deal its not veto worthy once you add in portis.. this trade is straight robbery... if you can get away with it then go ahead.. its obv nothing but good news for getting towns.. but to say not veto worthy? when booker has been on and off with his hips.. like hes dancing with the stars (the suns a star ;))  batum, ok hes good.. but hes good for AG.. so thats face value.. then you add in saric > portis but regardless its not by much once portis is hot... since they both have hot and cold days.. 


so basically a hurt booker (top 25 ceiling) = towns (top 3 fantasy player)?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...