candygram4mongo 136 Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 12 Team. Half ppr. Start 2RB, 2WR 1RB/WR Flex Me: WRs: Hopkins, MT, Boyd, Cooks RBs: Mixon, Collins, Barber, CThompson, McGuire 7-2 Him: WRs: AJGreen, Baldwin, Ridley, Goodwin, Cobb RBs: Barkley, AP, TColeman, PLindsay, 5-4 I need a reliable RB2, and I've got Boyd on my bench every week. He is weak at WR and has 4 startable RBs. Is giving Cooks for Lindsay too much? Maybe offer Boyd for Lindsay? Link to post Share on other sites
BAllerding 28 Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 I think I like Boyd better especially with Green Injured. I would make the deal though either way. Link to post Share on other sites
TheLivingLegend 101 Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 I would. It’s a solid trade for both teams. Link to post Share on other sites
dams513 94 Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 I wouldn't make the trade. Lindsay is going to get his touches broken into when Freeman comes back. Even if he stays the lead back, Freeman won't go away like Penny did because he's been pretty decent. Lead back of a RBBC isn't worth cooks in my opinion. Maybe cooks + Collins for Coleman? Tbh only one of his RB's I really like is saquon, the others are unreliable to me(AP because he lost 3 o lineman this week, 2 for the season). Link to post Share on other sites
Rush2112 4,351 Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 Nah keep you're players their the better ones for ROS Link to post Share on other sites
b0x 44 Posted November 9, 2018 Share Posted November 9, 2018 In a Vacuum, Cooks is worth more than Lindsey. However, you need Lindsey a lot more than you need Cooks. I would grit my teeth and do the deal, especially with the trade deadline approaching. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.