Jump to content
NBC Sports Edge Forums

Recommended Posts

Interesting.  When it was leaked that he wanted a "supportive environment" I thought about the Seahawks, but they were so far down the waiver list...

Edited by Iron-cock
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I'm firing him up everywhere.

😂🤣😂🤣😂     

Mods coming into this thread:  

Posted Images

Yeah there’s just not a lot of passing volume on the Hawks and Gordon has always needed 10+ targets per game to put up a solid fantasy line. He may break a few highlight plays if he can still get to the ball but even if he leaps up to #2 on the depth chart I don’t think he’ll break the WR4 tier.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DerrickHenrysCleats said:

 

He basicaly takes all the old Dissly targets which should be 5-7 a game and red zone looks with his contested catch ability

 

last game out DK had 3 receptions, 2 for TDs (Dissly role confirmed) ... plus the kid is far more explosive at this stage of the game than Gordon. 

hard pass on this.  not good. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather have Gordon than Metcalf.

 

Metcalf is a basket catcher, JG will go up and get it.

 

Jaron Brown

David Moore

Like Wilson

Ed Dickson

DK Metcalf

Tyler Lockett

 

None of those WRs or TEs can go up a d get the ball like JG can. I think Russell Wilson will love throwing to Gordon with the way he snatches the ball in traffic.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, pastorofmuppets2 said:

 

last game out DK had 3 receptions, 2 for TDs (Dissly role confirmed) ... plus the kid is far more explosive at this stage of the game than Gordon. 

hard pass on this.  not good. 

 

Pete Carroll felt differently. Claiming Gordon is telling the world that they aren't satisfied with what they got.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, pastorofmuppets2 said:

 

last game out DK had 3 receptions, 2 for TDs (Dissly role confirmed) ... plus the kid is far more explosive at this stage of the game than Gordon. 

hard pass on this.  not good. 

 

I hate this for fantasy.  The Seahawks tend to be very low pass volume unless they're behind and it's going to screw either DK or Gordon if not both.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, jmcampbe11 said:

So for everyone getting all worked up at Gordon going to the Seahawks when was the last time a Russell Wilson led team had two reliable starting fantasy WR options? This definitely hurts Lockett's value and I think he was already a sell high before the Gordon acquisition. 

Lockett and Dissley in 2019?

Edited by ss3walkman
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GenerallyPoorAdvice said:

 

Note the username, but my instant reaction is they will force-feed him Sunday, he will have production with 9-11 targets, but after this game things will level out in the run-based offense and he will be a high-end WR3/flex.

 

in what freakin world is he suiting up THIS week?

🍻

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right now: 

"How does this affect Gordon?!

How does this affect Russ?!

How does this affect DK?! 

How does this affect Carson?!"

2 Weeks from now:

"Josh Gordon was released from the Seahawks today."

 

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ajs723 said:

Right now: 

"How does this affect Gordon?!

How does this affect Russ?!

How does this affect DK?! 

How does this affect Carson?!"

2 Weeks from now:

"Josh Gordon was released from the Seahawks today."

 

 

this guy ^ gets it 👍

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

SEA is not as bad of a landing spot as many make it out to be. They are towards the bottom in pass attempts per game but are top 10 in completion percentage; 13th in passing yards per game; and tied for second for passing TDs. We know Russ can extend plays and is an elite deep-ball passer. 

 

It could have been worse. 

Edited by Grayson2401
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...