FitzMagic 4,260 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 That's a superb landing spot for him. They have nothing after Kittle. Should have an immediate fantasy impact. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Walter330i 26 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 Sanders to the 49ers what do you guys think?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FinsUp24 519 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 Awwwww yeaaaaaaaaa babyyyyyy. 49ers are the perfect spot. Jimmy G is more than capable of getting him the ball, great offensive coach, and they really paid up for Sanders so you know they’ve got big plans for him. Love it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FFdisciple 100 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 2 minutes ago, FitzMagic said: That's a superb landing spot for him. They have nothing after Kittle. Should have an immediate fantasy impact. How much impact this year is the BIG question? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lolcopter 7,890 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 RIP Pettis hype finally 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
oliminator123 3,450 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 Am I the only one not that excited? Jimmy hasn't looked great throwing the ball, and this offense isn't exactly lighting the world on fire. 6 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
K197040 2,438 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 1 minute ago, lolcopter said: RIP Pettis hype finally Au contraire. Having Sanders means that the field should open up for Dante. In just 24, he's gone from a bench stash to an every week starter. Congrats to everyone who held on to Captain Pettis. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DiddleThatKitty 71 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 3 minutes ago, FFdisciple said: How much impact this year is the BIG question? Huh? You don’t think he has enough time left this season to have an impact? Are you serious? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lolcopter 7,890 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 I wouldn't start any WR on this team. No RB, no TE, no care 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
smetana34 429 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 Just now, oliminator123 said: Am I the only one not that excited? Jimmy hasn't looked great throwing the ball, and this offense isn't exactly lighting the world on fire. I'm with you. Jimmy sucks and they want to run the ball. Coupled with a great defense (not many. if any, shootouts) this is the least desirable spot of any of the rumored trade partners. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FinsUp24 519 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 1 minute ago, oliminator123 said: Am I the only one not that excited? Jimmy hasn't looked great throwing the ball, and this offense isn't exactly lighting the world on fire. Yes. Because Sanders was borderline droppable after watching Flacco play last week. Just so happy he got out of that terrible situation. The packers would’ve been a better landing spot, but beggars can’t be choosers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bhawks489 3,678 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 What WRs on the 49ers were startabke before the sanders trade? I wouldn’t be too optimistic, just a slight bump from DEN 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jamor 20 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 (edited) So which trade is more valuable. Sanders on 49ers or Sanu on NE? Edited October 22, 2019 by jamor Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FitzMagic 4,260 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 Just now, bhawks489 said: What WRs on the 49ers were startabke before the sanders trade? I wouldn’t be too optimistic, just a slight bump from DEN There weren't startable because they suck. Emmanuel Sanders is not that type of guy. I mean, when a TE is your lead receiver then there is obviously a problem with the talent. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
nromn 431 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 1 minute ago, FitzMagic said: That's a superb landing spot for him. They have nothing after Kittle. Should have an immediate fantasy impact. Think so? Seems like they want to limit JGs exposure to opposing Ds as much as possible. The guy probably averages 200 yards passing. I guess it could be a chicken or egg argument with him and argue they don’t throw much because he has no weapons, but with how that D and running game is, I don’t see a lot of throwing. Whereas, at least in Den, they need to throw, even if they are not good at it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ST. STEVEN 4,411 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 Jimmy is a huge upgrade at QB for Manny. They will scheme him ways to get the ball. Side note, he will not have a BYE this year either. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dropshadows 269 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 Just now, nromn said: I guess it could be a chicken or egg argument with him The optimist in me agrees with this. The optimist in me also says almost anything is better than Flacco/Denver. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ryansm11 2,163 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 I think the landing spot is okay, my bigger concern is building chemistry and getting acclimated to the playbook. I’d temper expectations for a start or two Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tts42572 920 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 4 minutes ago, bhawks489 said: What WRs on the 49ers were startabke before the sanders trade? I wouldn’t be too optimistic, just a slight bump from DEN Agree. I'm not sure he improves his value. Yeah, Denver was ugly....But SF has been ugly for passing also. Seems like a fairly lateral move to me. Great move for Denver getting a 3rd and 4th rounder though for a 32 year old that wasn't in their future plans. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
General Gannicus 308 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 2 minutes ago, jamor said: So which trade is more valuable. Sanders on 49ers or Sanu on NE? Sanu is much more valuable... A second for Sanu to move the sticks and be a red zone target going to the team who has been after him since before the draft is gonna be a smash landing spot... Sanders who is always dragging some body part going to a heavy run oriented team with a meh qb as a half year rental seems very "Golden Tate to the Eagles" to me... If I had Sanders I'd trade him for Sanu in a second if I could... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
smetana34 429 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 2 minutes ago, Ryansm11 said: I think the landing spot is okay, my bigger concern is building chemistry and getting acclimated to the playbook. I’d temper expectations for a start or two Scangerello (Denver's OC) worked under Shanahan before taking the job in Denver. I'd venture to guess a lot of the playbook, verbiage, and concepts are the same, meaning Sanders should make a quick transition 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PlayTheWaivers 1,886 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 IDK how the situation is any different...Kittle = Sutton this offense and Flacco has actually been doing BETTER than Jimmy G aside from last week....high-end WR3 at best...amari cooper is the exception to trades mid-season that work out Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Brownsfan74 889 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 Sanders must be happy. Gonna have another shot at a ring. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LongBalls 1,193 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 (edited) Anyone who thinks this is a downgrade hasn't watched enough Broncos. Flacco makes Jimmy G look like Brady. Also SF run game has been crap since Juszcyk got injured. If they're interested in that "contender" tag they better got the air game going, and I'm assuming Sanders will be a big part of that effort as outside of Kittle the SF pass catchers are also crap. Edited October 22, 2019 by LongBalls 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MoonBlaster 267 Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 (edited) 12 minutes ago, PlayTheWaivers said: IDK how the situation is any different...Kittle = Sutton this offense and Flacco has actually been doing BETTER than Jimmy G aside from last week....high-end WR3 at best...amari cooper is the exception to trades mid-season that work out I'm guessing you're basing that statement purely off of total fantasy points because in no other way has Flacco been better than Garoppolo.. and that's only due to the 49ers having their bye already while Denver has not. Not that Jimmy G is an otherworldly upgrade but at least he isn't going to be benched during the season the way Flacco very well might. Edited October 22, 2019 by MoonBlaster Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.