Jump to content
NBC Sports Edge Forums

Duncan Robinson 2019-2020 Outlook


Message added by tonycpsu

[Thread for previous season 2019 automatically locked. Feel free to post a new thread for 2020.]

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

We take you to a live look-in at Robinson's night against Cleveland: 

I swear this guy doesn’t get enough forum love. I’m telling my girl that if she ever meets him she gets a hall pass, f it dude 

Maybe he looked up mitch rob game log😎

Specializing in a cat in itself isn’t cause for devaluing a player.  The only reasoning for devaluing his contributions are if you have too much 3PT production or if you’re punting.  I really don’t get why mgrs will fade a player when their production is heavily concentrated.  Stats are pretty fungible in leagues that allow for streaming, which is most of them. 
 

 Duncan’s been top-80 overall in 9-cat for the past month.  That is rosterable in most leagues.  

Edited by 80version
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, but the first reason you brought up is probably a thing. That's why I cut Duncan last week. You find a lot of players making a good amount of threes: Hardaway, Bertans, Bogdanovic, Fournier, Reddick, Gallo. And they mostly contribute in other areas. But nevertheless I think Duncan should have a roster spot in every 12 team league.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dorwell said:

Yeah, but the first reason you brought up is probably a thing. That's why I cut Duncan last week. You find a lot of players making a good amount of threes: Hardaway, Bertans, Bogdanovic, Fournier, Reddick, Gallo. And they mostly contribute in other areas. But nevertheless I think Duncan should have a roster spot in every 12 team league.

The difference is all the others u mentioned were most likely drafted players.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 80version said:

Specializing in a cat in itself isn’t cause for devaluing a player.  The only reasoning for devaluing his contributions are if you have too much 3PT production or if you’re punting.  I really don’t get why mgrs will fade a player when their production is heavily concentrated.  Stats are pretty fungible in leagues that allow for streaming, which is most of them. 
 

 Duncan’s been top-80 overall in 9-cat for the past month.  That is rosterable in most leagues.  


Definitely must own in 12ers , and borderline in 10 teams. Just depends on how you play the game. I personally don’t like rostering specialists . Whether it’s 3’s , blocks , assists , whatever . I prefer a more well balanced approach. Although Duncan does contribute good %’s and some boards . Which boosts him into the Top 100 . Ohh and his low TO’s 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/6/2020 at 12:35 PM, Johnnyapplebot said:

In the 10th round.

 

Can I play against you next season if you know how to play Rotisserie? I can't never let free money slip through my hands lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Trench Mob said:

 

Can I play against you next season if you know how to play Rotisserie? I can't never let free money slip through my hands lol.

i play head to head and he doesnt get stocks, why are you so offended that I said hes a super elite 3 point specialist who gets no stocks?

Edited by Johnnyapplebot
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Johnnyapplebot said:

i play head to head and he doesnt get stocks, why are you so offended that I said hes a super elite 3 point specialist who gets no stocks?

 

So just the other day he didn't get no other stats? So the majority of the season he never rebounds or gets steals? Mkay.

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Johnnyapplebot said:

hes averaging 0.5 steals and 0.2 stocks...wtf?

 

Round up 0.5 and that's a steal. And I think you mean 0.2 blocks. Which no one ever said anything about blocks anyways.

 

He's a positive in FG%, rebounds, points, and 3's. He's never going to be a main source for peripherals. Not everyone is going to be a Isaac or Covington.

 

Edited by Trench Mob
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Trench Mob said:

 

Round up 0.5 and that's a steal. And I think you mean 0.2 blocks. Which no one ever said anything about blocks anyways.

 

He's a positive in FG%, rebounds, points, and 3's. He's never going to be a main source for peripherals. Not everyone is going to be a Isaac or Covington.

 

Also doesn't hurt u in FT/TOs

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, DezedandConfused said:

Also doesn't hurt u in FT/TOs

 

I was about to say turnovers, but I don't consider that to be a category. I punt turnovers out of reflex because pretty much the most elite fantasy players turnover the ball alot. When they don't, that's good too. Not hurting me either way.

 

Edited by Trench Mob
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Trench Mob said:

 

Round up 0.5 and that's a steal. And I think you mean 0.2 blocks. Which no one ever said anything about blocks anyways.

 

He's a positive in FG%, rebounds, points, and 3's. He's never going to be a main source for peripherals. Not everyone is going to be a Isaac or Covington.

 

 

You don't just round up. Doesn't work that way. There's a big difference between 0.5 and 1.0 steals, and 1.0 steal isn't even very good. He's also not a positive in rebounds. He averages 3.3 at the SF/PF spot. You could pick almost any other player at those positions and they'll provide more than 3.3. FG% relative to the 3's he provides is great but it is not a positive taken at face value. He is also not a positive in points (-0.43 z score). I love Duncan but he is the definition of 3 point specialist.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, LuSamSiam said:

 

You don't just round up. Doesn't work that way. There's a big difference between 0.5 and 1.0 steals, and 1.0 steal isn't even very good. He's also not a positive in rebounds. He averages 3.3 at the SF/PF spot. You could pick almost any other player at those positions and they'll provide more than 3.3. FG% relative to the 3's he provides is great but it is not a positive taken at face value. He is also not a positive in points (-0.43 z score). I love Duncan but he is the definition of 3 point specialist.

Fg%, points, TOs, he's the only one averaging over 5 threes on over 50% shooting

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...