Fantasyscrub 365 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 Someone in my league just got Harden for Lillard + Lonzo + Ibaka. 12 team, 9 cat, h2h I'm livid and this it's league breaking Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tifaes 65 Posted January 16, 2020 Share Posted January 16, 2020 I def prefer the Hardens side, but wouldnt call it league breaking, just pretty lobsided. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bkw77 181 Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 Yeah not much wrong with it - Lillards a top 6 fantasy guy, I'd rather Harden but it's not too bad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
freddo 378 Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 i'd veto it but have seen worse. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ncbobcats 164 Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 Not close to league breaking. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RunCMC 2,607 Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 I mean Lillard and Lonzo should have been enough imo for that trade. Those 2 combined should give you roughly what Harden is doing . Also depends who the Harden side is dropping to make it happen . The good thing about trades like that or even 2 for 1 , is you gain an extra roster spot or 2. Which you can either stream or grab high upside players. So in essence the Harden side not only gets the best player , but you get to pickup an extra player to complete your team build however you see fit. That's where the value comes in 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
fabrar 2,897 Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 I actually prefer the Lillard side I think. This seems like a punt fg build so lonzo would be pretty damn valuable with his assists, out of position boards and steals. Lillard is a top 6 guy as well. Ibaka is cherry on top. Not league breaking at all Quote Link to post Share on other sites
samtal33k 166 Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 HAHA what’s league breaking about it. It’s very fair actually Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mbell317 464 Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 Yeah that's not unfair. Good trade. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
vthokie3 1,371 Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 Dont think it's vetoable as others have mentioned. Would rather have harden though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
beejay6020 239 Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 15 hours ago, RunCMC said: I mean Lillard and Lonzo should have been enough imo for that trade. Those 2 combined should give you roughly what Harden is doing . Also depends who the Harden side is dropping to make it happen . The good thing about trades like that or even 2 for 1 , is you gain an extra roster spot or 2. Which you can either stream or grab high upside players. So in essence the Harden side not only gets the best player , but you get to pickup an extra player to complete your team build however you see fit. That's where the value comes in spot on - exactly what ppl miss - ive sometimes done 2 for 1 trades because theres someone on the wire ive had my eye on and then if you weigh up the real 2 for 2 thats the proper evaluation but ppl get fixated on the 2 for 1. def bit lopsided but Harden is so far ahead its not that bad. lonzo and Ibaka pure sell high - remember they were both super average at the start of the year until team injuries saved their seasons 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Taipan 424 Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 Not vetoable, sorry pal!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kermiekiller 195 Posted January 19, 2020 Share Posted January 19, 2020 Prefer Harden but Lillard ain't no slouch himself. Lonzo and Ibaka can be nice depth pieces. Help with mine please... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.