CorreaTown 34 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 Reached on him because the upside was too good to pass up... hopefully his health holds up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
leffe186 662 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 Just drafted him #85. Can't help but feel that I've essentially drafted him for one game, but since my oppo week 1 has Deshaun I might just be OK with that. Fingers crossed we get a few more games. If he makes it into double figures for games played it could still be a great season. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jay2491 70 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 Keenan Allen was just as injury prone till he wasn't. Hoping he finally plays 13-14 games 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PlayTheWaivers 1,886 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 1 hour ago, griffin727 said: Realllllly tempted to play him week 1. Just seems like a shoe in for one long TD in this matchup. Definitely a high range WR3 in this matchup...plus Cooks might not even play. Fuller may break on his first game, but Deshaun Watson and the Texans projections are pretty freaking high for week one (and still will maybe get blown out according to Vegas.) If Watson and Texans implied points are high...well...do the math. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RunCMC 2,532 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 2 hours ago, PlayTheWaivers said: Definitely a high range WR3 in this matchup...plus Cooks might not even play. Fuller may break on his first game, but Deshaun Watson and the Texans projections are pretty freaking high for week one (and still will maybe get blown out according to Vegas.) If Watson and Texans implied points are high...well...do the math. #Rule 1 of fantasy fight club: If Fuller is healthy you must plug him in, especially now with DHop gone. 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Boudewijn 4,703 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 1 minute ago, RunCMC said: #Rule 1 of fantasy fight club: If Fuller is healthy you must plug him in, especially now with DHop gone. Well yes. Because it's quite hard to plug him in when he's not healthy, so if you don't play him week 1... why did anyone draft him? 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Trifecta 2,140 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 10 minutes ago, Boudewijn said: Well yes. Because it's quite hard to plug him in when he's not healthy, so if you don't play him week 1... why did anyone draft him? This realization dawned on me just before I opened this thread and I plugged him into my WR2. Play him until the wheels fall off. If they don't, he will be a draft day steal. 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
leffe186 662 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 7 hours ago, Boudewijn said: Well yes. Because it's quite hard to plug him in when he's not healthy, so if you don't play him week 1... why did anyone draft him? This is probably the one time when not playing Fuller just seems really silly. Sure, you might get nothing, but you could be looking at 20 pts or more. I mean, if you're stacked, then sure, but most people will have drafted him late enough to be a FLEX or Bench player. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GOAT-dell Beckham 117 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 He’s a must start for everyone not in a 6 team league. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JoeJoe88 1,164 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 I don’t see how you drafted the guy and you’re not starting in this matchup. He should have a big one. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spyplane 1,593 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 Last year @KC (with Hopkins out😞 9 targets, 5 catches for 44 yards and 0 TD. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spyplane 1,593 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 That was an unintentional emoji but still fitting. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PlayTheWaivers 1,886 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 3 minutes ago, Spyplane said: Last year @KC (with Hopkins out😞 9 targets, 5 catches for 44 yards and 0 TD. Week 6 of last year was almost a year ago...these times are a little different year over year. Also, Hopkins wasn't out as he had 12 targets. Fuller has 90 yards in the playoffs at KC. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spyplane 1,593 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 4 minutes ago, PlayTheWaivers said: Week 6 of last year was almost a year ago...these times are a little different year over year. Also, Hopkins wasn't out as he had 12 targets. Fuller has 90 yards in the playoffs at KC. My bad, I probably missed him because his line was equally as bad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dreams And Dwightmares 3,229 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 (edited) 11 hours ago, PlayTheWaivers said: Definitely a high range WR3 in this matchup...plus Cooks might not even play. Fuller may break on his first game, but Deshaun Watson and the Texans projections are pretty freaking high for week one (and still will maybe get blown out according to Vegas.) If Watson and Texans implied points are high...well...do the math. WR3? LOL Edited September 9, 2020 by Dreams And Dwightmares 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MBarbarian 968 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 To all the "must start" people, no one is starting Fuller over studs like Michael Thomas, Davante, Tyreek, etc., so where do you realistically draw the line? Here are Justin Boone's early Week 1 WR rankings (half pt ppr), made before Cooks injury news: 1 Michael Thomas NO vs TB 2 Davante Adams GB @ MIN 3 Tyreek Hill KC vs HOU 4 Julio Jones ATL vs SEA 5 Allen Robinson CHI @ DET 6 Chris Godwin TB @ NO 7 Kenny Golladay DET vs CHI 8 Mike Evans TB @ NO 9 D.J. Moore CAR vs LV 10 DeAndre Hopkins ARI @ SF 11 JuJu Smith-Schuster PIT @ NYG 12 Adam Thielen MIN vs GB 13 A.J. Brown TEN @ DEN 14 Robert Woods LAR vs DAL 15 Calvin Ridley ATL vs SEA 16 Keenan Allen LAC @ CIN 17 Terry McLaurin WAS vs PHI 18 Amari Cooper DAL @ LAR 19 D.J. Chark JAC vs IND 20 DeSean Jackson PHI @ WAS 21 Stefon Diggs BUF vs NYJ 22 Tyler Lockett SEA @ ATL 23 Will Fuller HOU @ KC 24 Cooper Kupp LAR vs DAL I don't think I'd start Fuller over any of these top 12. I'd maybe put Fuller somewhere in the 13 - 16 range, ahead of guys like Woods and Keenan Allen, but after McLaurin (look what McLaurin did to PHI in both meetings last year). That makes Fuller not even a WR1 this week, so definitely not a "must start." Thoughts? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ludawg23 1,982 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 Chiefs have some key guys out in the secondary - if you're not gonna start this guy on opening night in a 54.5 O/U game, you might as well trade/drop him. Thinking he will get off to a hot start and have a solid game tomorrow night. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dreams And Dwightmares 3,229 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 1 minute ago, MBarbarian said: To all the "must start" people, no one is starting Fuller over studs like Michael Thomas, Davante, Tyreek, etc., so where do you realistically draw the line? Here are Justin Boone's early Week 1 WR rankings (half pt ppr), made before Cooks injury news: 1 Michael Thomas NO vs TB 2 Davante Adams GB @ MIN 3 Tyreek Hill KC vs HOU 4 Julio Jones ATL vs SEA 5 Allen Robinson CHI @ DET 6 Chris Godwin TB @ NO 7 Kenny Golladay DET vs CHI 8 Mike Evans TB @ NO 9 D.J. Moore CAR vs LV 10 DeAndre Hopkins ARI @ SF 11 JuJu Smith-Schuster PIT @ NYG 12 Adam Thielen MIN vs GB 13 A.J. Brown TEN @ DEN 14 Robert Woods LAR vs DAL 15 Calvin Ridley ATL vs SEA 16 Keenan Allen LAC @ CIN 17 Terry McLaurin WAS vs PHI 18 Amari Cooper DAL @ LAR 19 D.J. Chark JAC vs IND 20 DeSean Jackson PHI @ WAS 21 Stefon Diggs BUF vs NYJ 22 Tyler Lockett SEA @ ATL 23 Will Fuller HOU @ KC 24 Cooper Kupp LAR vs DAL I don't think I'd start Fuller over any of these top 12. I'd maybe put Fuller somewhere in the 13 - 16 range, ahead of guys like Woods and Keenan Allen, but after McLaurin (look what McLaurin did to PHI in both meetings last year). That makes Fuller not even a WR1 this week, so definitely not a "must start." Thoughts? Oh, you won't start Will Fuller over your WR1? Very very interesting... I guess in a league where you start only WR1 this argument can hold up. I'm not aware of that league though lol. 2 1 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SadFaceHappy 2,049 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 Just now, ludawg23 said: Chiefs have some key guys out in the secondary - if you're not gonna start this guy on opening night in a 54.5 O/U game, you might as well trade/drop him. Thinking he will get off to a hot start and have a solid game tomorrow night. This. The only thing that knocked Fuller down draft boards is the fact he'll probably miss half the season with some kind of injury. Any other #2 wr who put up the numbers he has, and is returning with the alpha wr commanding 30% target share now gone, would be a top 40 pick. Why did anyone draft him if not to use him as long as he's available? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MBarbarian 968 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 2 minutes ago, Dreams And Dwightmares said: Oh, you won't start Will Fuller over your WR1? Very very interesting... I guess in a league where you start only WR1 this argument can hold up. I'm not aware of that league though lol. Very, very helpful post, thanks. Your contributions to this forum and its users looking for information is unparalleled. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Michael Bluth 942 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 It’s fuller or woods for me. Feels like a coin flip. but I can watch Sunday night football and I can’t watch thursdays game so that always sneaks into your decision making. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
leffe186 662 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 13 minutes ago, MBarbarian said: Very, very helpful post, thanks. Your contributions to this forum and its users looking for information is unparalleled. 🙂 Yours was a bit of a weird post though. You're going to have at least 2 WR spots and 1 FLEX, probably more. He's likely to be your WR3. I got him in the 9th round. He doesn't need to be better than your WR1, he needs to beat out your WR3/4, and your RB3/4. For the upside, that should be a no-brainer. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MBarbarian 968 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 5 minutes ago, leffe186 said: 🙂 Yours was a bit of a weird post though. You're going to have at least 2 WR spots and 1 FLEX, probably more. He's likely to be your WR3. I got him in the 9th round. He doesn't need to be better than your WR1, he needs to beat out your WR3/4, and your RB3/4. For the upside, that should be a no-brainer. I hear you, but "must start" to me means must start no matter what. A lot of people (like me) may have two WRs in that 1-12 range and a RB starting in their flex. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jagsfan05 601 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 14 minutes ago, Michael Bluth said: It’s fuller or woods for me. Feels like a coin flip. but I can watch Sunday night football and I can’t watch thursdays game so that always sneaks into your decision making. I have the same issue in my flex spot. I'm probably going with Woods. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PlayTheWaivers 1,886 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 15 minutes ago, Michael Bluth said: It’s fuller or woods for me. Feels like a coin flip. but I can watch Sunday night football and I can’t watch thursdays game so that always sneaks into your decision making. Floor vs ceiling is how you should weigh your decision vs. your opponent's matchups 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.