lolcopter 7,916 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 Local radio guys talking like him and Hamler aren't playing already so I wouldn't hold out that much hope Quote Link to post Share on other sites
StevieStats 3,888 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 3 hours ago, RunCMC said: I'm with y'all on this. Just sit damnit & get right, terrible matchup anyways @ PIT Don't need this dilemma of starting him or not .. incase he suits up. It's almost like the Broncos want their best offensive player on the field for their difficult match up... Crazy huh? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RunCMC 2,581 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 1 hour ago, StevieStats said: It's almost like the Broncos want their best offensive player on the field for their difficult match up... Crazy huh? Yes Stevie. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kdko 1,197 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 Sitting him this week. Not a fan of the risk. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
leffe186 662 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 6 hours ago, kdko said: Sitting him this week. Not a fan of the risk. Yeah me too. I guess the question is, who are you playing ahead of him? I'm going Parris Campbell, and Conner and James Robinson in the FLEX. Anyone going "lower" than that? How much risk are we willing to take? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scheibler 752 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 (edited) I wouldn't start him coming off an injury against an elite dst. Sure he could have a nice game, but odds are he doesn't. I love the talent, but I'll likely try to sell after a blow-up game. Week 11 on looks pretty rough Pitt: - Tampa: - underated dst Jets: + NE: - Miami: good secondary, but I'd say+ KC: + imo, but stats say - ATL: + LV: + Chargers: - NO: - KC: + imo, but stats say - Carolina: + Bills: - Chargers: - Edited September 19, 2020 by scheibler 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Honolulu Blue Balls 37 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 I'm starting him out of desperation if active, though I agree with those who are sitting him regardless of whether he suits up. Big risk, I just have no better options (Kenny G and Sutton were supposed to be my 1-2 punch). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spyplane 1,607 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rozr1 67 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 Sit for me as well, kinda like brandon cooks in week 1, not taking any chances til he's all system go. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jhomes55 41 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 11 hours ago, leffe186 said: Yeah me too. I guess the question is, who are you playing ahead of him? I'm going Parris Campbell, and Conner and James Robinson in the FLEX. Anyone going "lower" than that? How much risk are we willing to take? Funny..... I too have Conner/Robinson in possible flex. (But prob starting D Johnson instead.) But right now I’m going to sit Sutton one more week. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The G Man 1,117 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports Broncos WR Courtland Sutton (shoulder, questionable) "has a good chance to play today." Sutton should still be a game-time decision but the news is trending positive on him. He suffered an AC joint injury that ultimately held him out of action in Week 1. He logged limited practices throughout the week. Denver desperately needs Sutton back if they want to avoid starting the year with two losses. They travel to Pittsburgh this week and will face a dominant defense. Sutton's presence on the outside will help Drew Lock in his bid to upset the Steelers. He wasn't able to get much production from his receivers in Week 1. Jerry Jeudy led all Denver wideouts with 56 yards while TE Noah Fant reached 81 yards. SOURCE: Ian Rapoport on Twitter Sep 20, 2020, 8:39 AM ET 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mulhollandvelvet 997 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 Sit and see. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Cody_ODea 16 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 Staring down some tough decisions with this guy. If he plays, what's a reasonable expectation? Is he a 10+ target guy today or do we have any clue if he can even catch a jump ball? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DConny1 125 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 A couple days ago, Stephania Bell was saying that Sutton was having trouble reaching for catches to one side of his body. Against that D, I won't be starting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rigadoog 270 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 28 minutes ago, Cody_ODea said: Staring down some tough decisions with this guy. If he plays, what's a reasonable expectation? Is he a 10+ target guy today or do we have any clue if he can even catch a jump ball? Like @DConny1 said, apparently at thursday's practice he could only catch with one hand on his right side, but two on the left. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Cody_ODea 16 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 I read that. To me, i was hoping it meant that he could if he wanted but didn't want to push it until he had to. Still scary interpreting it that way, I'll admit. 1 minute ago, rigadoog said: Like @DConny1 said, apparently at thursday's practice he could only catch with one hand on his right side, but two on the left. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Fried Pork Grind 524 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 He’s a sit for me in two leagues. Too risky and the matchup makes it a no brainer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SharkSwimmer 5,007 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 I guess it depends on your head to head matchup and which WR you have to plug in if you do not have Sutton active this week. But I am inclined to sit Sutton, as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shakestreet 4,135 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 What am I going to do... 🤷♂️🤔. I don’t f-ing know what is the play. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shakestreet 4,135 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 1 minute ago, SharkSwimmer said: I guess it depends on your head to head matchup and which WR you have to plug in if you do not have Sutton active this week. But I am inclined to sit Sutton, as well. Check ✅... 3 WR set. Ridley, Dionte Johnson are set. Tre’Quan, Lazard or Sutton . 🤦♂️🤬 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cdd10 1,200 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 1 minute ago, shakestreet said: Check ✅... 3 WR set. Ridley, Dionte Johnson are set. Tre’Quan, Lazard or Sutton . 🤦♂️🤬 Lazard 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SharkSwimmer 5,007 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 And sometimes teams use big name WRs who are too hurt to actually play the position at full strength as decoys. Detroit used to do it with Calvin Johnson when he was hurt sometimes. Probably contributed to his decision to retire early. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SharkSwimmer 5,007 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 Tre'Quon with no Michael Thomas might be fun. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
oliminator123 3,450 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 He is playing today. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mulhollandvelvet 997 Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 The worrisome part is a re aggravation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.