Jump to content
NBC Sports Edge Forums

Looking for opinions about a trade


Recommended Posts

Hey all, just looking for an opinion on whether I should veto a trade or not. This is my first time being a comissioner, it's in a twelve team full PPR Superflex league.

I'm leaning towards a veto but not quite sure. Let me know what you think, here's the deal. 

 

Team A gets

David Johnson

LeVeon Bell

Zach Ertz

Parris Campbell 

 

Team B Gets

Keenan Allen

Rob Gronkowski 

Jordan Howard

Teddy Bridgewater

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ajd1186 said:

Hey all, just looking for an opinion on whether I should veto a trade or not. This is my first time being a comissioner, it's in a twelve team full PPR Superflex league.

I'm leaning towards a veto but not quite sure. Let me know what you think, here's the deal. 

 

Team A gets

David Johnson

LeVeon Bell

Zach Ertz

Parris Campbell 

 

Team B Gets

Keenan Allen

Rob Gronkowski 

Jordan Howard

Teddy Bridgewater

I looks bad, but Bridgewater does have value in a super/flex. I'd have to see both teams rosters before I say it's a flat out veto. If team B is loaded at RB and needs a QB for his super/flex it's possible. I'm not that high on Bell or Johnson. I like Allen and Ertz. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it's veto worthy.   Seems like there are position changes that could help both teams.  Keep in mind, we're not talking David Johnson, Leveon Bell, Gronk, Howard of a few years ago.    I think name recognition is skewing this one a bit.  Team A may have gone RB heavy and needs a WR.   Team B might have gone WR heavy and needs RB help.   It'd help to see the rosters, but I don't think it's worth a veto.  

 

The only thing that raises my eyebrows is if it's a swap of similar positions with drastically different values.   This seems like it's mostly WR for RB and some other parts.  

Edited by bounce
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, bounce said:

I don't think it's veto worthy.   Seems like there are position changes that could help both teams.  Keep in mind, we're not talking David Johnson, Leveon Bell, Gronk, Howard of a few years ago.    I think name recognition is skewing this one a bit.  Team A may have gone RB heavy and needs a WR.   Team B might have gone WR heavy and needs RB help.   It'd help to see the rosters, but I don't think it's worth a veto.  

 

The only thing that raises my eyebrows is if it's a swap of similar positions with drastically different values.   This seems like it's mostly WR for RB and some other parts.  

Probably would help to see rosters. But based on just looking at the trade yikes.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, cdd10 said:

Probably would help to see rosters. But based on just looking at the trade yikes.

 

Yikes is one thing.   But IMO the only thing veto worthy is if it seems like cheating.   This doesn't seem like cheating to me.  But again, rosters would help. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...