ajs723 3,630 Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 30 minutes ago, CooL said: If Ingram doesn’t go, he’s likely the two down banger and GL, right? Stingy Steelers D but maybe we can expect 40-50 years with chance for TD? Desperate times call for desperate measures... Much more valuable in standard than PPR because he doesn't catch any passes, but he should see decent carry volume. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mr_X 3 Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 Is he a good stash? What's the status on Ingram for weeks ahead of 8? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CooL 3,281 Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 2 minutes ago, Mr_X said: Is he a good stash? What's the status on Ingram for weeks ahead of 8? As most note, it is a three way committee. Snap counts: Dobbins: 136 (21-18-30 last 3) Edwards: 127 (22-25-32) Ingram: 108 (14-19-9) Looks like even when healthy, Ingram was getting faded and that Edwards does have a role. For the most part seems pretty equal share with Dobbins so that's what I'd expect. Hoping he can fall into the end zone to hit value, but I'd be more comfortable with JK in PPR. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dfstout 2,182 Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 (edited) 19 hours ago, CooL said: If Ingram doesn’t go, he’s likely the two down banger and GL, right? Stingy Steelers D but maybe we can expect 40-50 years with chance for TD? Desperate times call for desperate measures... That's a long career, his nutritionist must be impeccable. I like it! Edited October 30, 2020 by dfstout 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dfstout 2,182 Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 On 9/29/2020 at 8:28 AM, pastorofmuppets2 said: no thread yet for this cat? 18/129 thru three games - that's a robust 7.2 per. frustrating Pvt. Dobbins owners worldwide, Harbags seems to really trust this dood - he ain't going away. in the event of an Ingram (or Dobbo) injury i could see him taking at upwards to 40% of the work ... he'll never fully put the kid in the rearview, of course - it's not the Ravens way ... Lamar will always be the rb1 there, regardless. anyways, chucking him into the 2020 player thread pool - it's about time. whatcha got? Big fan of hype buses, trains and various automobiles...with faces...bravo! 1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mr_X 3 Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 17 minutes ago, CooL said: As most note, it is a three way committee. Snap counts: Dobbins: 136 (21-18-30 last 3) Edwards: 127 (22-25-32) Ingram: 108 (14-19-9) Looks like even when healthy, Ingram was getting faded and that Edwards does have a role. For the most part seems pretty equal share with Dobbins so that's what I'd expect. Hoping he can fall into the end zone to hit value, but I'd be more comfortable with JK in PPR. Thanks! Totally looks like it's a three-eyed Raven here when it comes to running. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pastorofmuppets2 10,910 Posted October 30, 2020 Author Share Posted October 30, 2020 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pdizzle710 523 Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 Ingram out of practice again: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Thrill22 82 Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 no RB committee has rushed for over 90 yards against PIT, they are allowing 3.4 YPC, and 69 YPG, allowed 4 rushing TDs to RBs so far (tied for least in the league). he doesn't catch passes. PIT can score so there wont be any clock killing garbage time work. Not optimistic even with Ingram out. I think best case scenario we are looking at 12 carries for 50 yards. Lamar will be the leading rusher as usual and JK will get all the passing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BIGFATPANDA 426 Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 BUS SZN... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dannyz6969 151 Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 is gus a 1-3 week rental for RB desperate teams? I don't see long term upside here.. will dobbins sieze this rule in a matter of time? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CooL 3,281 Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 50 minutes ago, Thrill22 said: no RB committee has rushed for over 90 yards against PIT, they are allowing 3.4 YPC, and 69 YPG, allowed 4 rushing TDs to RBs so far (tied for least in the league). he doesn't catch passes. PIT can score so there wont be any clock killing garbage time work. Not optimistic even with Ingram out. I think best case scenario we are looking at 12 carries for 50 yards. Lamar will be the leading rusher as usual and JK will get all the passing. 5 points is better than 0 points, when your other options are Wayne Gallman, Kyle Juscsysk, Frank Gore, etc. The backup emergency RB landscape is pretty ugly out there in bigger leagues. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Thrill22 82 Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 6 minutes ago, CooL said: 5 points is better than 0 points, when your other options are Wayne Gallman, Kyle Juscsysk, Frank Gore, etc. The backup emergency RB landscape is pretty ugly out there in bigger leagues. best case scenario...could be something like 29 yards Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LacesOut 79 Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 Obviously his stats are skewed by a huge game week 17 last year, but he's overall 27 carries for 157 yards through three games v Steelers according to Sleeper. I still have a hard time believing he'll be much more than a desperation play but he might be a desperation play that has a hope. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bengalfan27 71 Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 More likely to get a TD against Steelers because Steelers focusing on Lamar in goalline my 2 cents. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FMIII 47 Posted October 31, 2020 Share Posted October 31, 2020 Has anyone added him with the intention of not to play and just hold to see how things play out? Looks like we don’t have definitive timeline for Ingram’s injury. Asking because I don’t know if the hold is worth it so looking for feedback - Next two games Pitt (1st hardest v RBs), @Ind (4th hardest v RBs) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
crotchcrickets 3,473 Posted October 31, 2020 Share Posted October 31, 2020 1 hour ago, FMIII said: Has anyone added him with the intention of not to play and just hold to see how things play out? Looks like we don’t have definitive timeline for Ingram’s injury. Asking because I don’t know if the hold is worth it so looking for feedback - Next two games Pitt (1st hardest v RBs), @Ind (4th hardest v RBs) Ingram owner here....yep 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ESquared 535 Posted October 31, 2020 Share Posted October 31, 2020 1 hour ago, FMIII said: Has anyone added him with the intention of not to play and just hold to see how things play out? Looks like we don’t have definitive timeline for Ingram’s injury. Asking because I don’t know if the hold is worth it so looking for feedback - Next two games Pitt (1st hardest v RBs), @Ind (4th hardest v RBs) Added him for this exact reason. ZERO desire to play him this week but if Ingram is out a while and Gus plays well and outplays Dobbins this week, then he becomes an intriguing option going forward. We know the Ravens love to run and we've seen Gus do well before, so I think he can be valuable. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
FMIII 47 Posted October 31, 2020 Share Posted October 31, 2020 31 minutes ago, ESquared said: Added him for this exact reason. ZERO desire to play him this week but if Ingram is out a while and Gus plays well and outplays Dobbins this week, then he becomes an intriguing option going forward. We know the Ravens love to run and we've seen Gus do well before, so I think he can be valuable. Yeah I haven’t seen a definitive timeline for Ingram’s return.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PhilaFanBoy 472 Posted October 31, 2020 Share Posted October 31, 2020 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AnonymousRob 3,904 Posted November 1, 2020 Share Posted November 1, 2020 Gus bus about to leave the station. Last chance for anyone needing a rb this week or next to hop on. I think he's going to get more touches than Dobbins. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Thrill22 82 Posted November 1, 2020 Share Posted November 1, 2020 On 10/30/2020 at 10:47 AM, Thrill22 said: no RB committee has rushed for over 90 yards against PIT, they are allowing 3.4 YPC, and 69 YPG, allowed 4 rushing TDs to RBs so far (tied for least in the league). he doesn't catch passes. PIT can score so there wont be any clock killing garbage time work. Not optimistic even with Ingram out. I think best case scenario we are looking at 12 carries for 50 yards. Lamar will be the leading rusher as usual and JK will get all the passing. Clearly I know nothing about football Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CooL 3,281 Posted November 1, 2020 Share Posted November 1, 2020 (edited) On 10/29/2020 at 3:44 PM, CooL said: If Ingram doesn’t go, he’s likely the two down banger and GL, right? Stingy Steelers D but maybe we can expect 40-50 years with chance for TD? Desperate times call for desperate measures... [...] Interesting that JK only got 1 catch and wasn't involved in passing attack at all. Then again, it's pretty clear that Lamar isn't that great this year. Gus probably retains a lot of value if Ingram is out for a while. Baltimore will just run because Lamar can't throw. Edited November 1, 2020 by tonycpsu Removed Cool Story Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DLG10 863 Posted November 1, 2020 Share Posted November 1, 2020 How bad is the Ingram injury Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gbill2004 1,523 Posted November 1, 2020 Share Posted November 1, 2020 1 minute ago, DLG10 said: How bad is the Ingram injury High ankle. Couple more weeks probably. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.