Jump to content
NBC Sports Edge Forums

Do you see major issues with this Roster Setting?


Recommended Posts

PG, PG, SG, SG/SF, SG/SF, F, PF, PF/C, C

I'm thinking h2h points (1 per point, 1.2 per reb, 1.5 per ast, 3 per stl/bk, -1 per TO) 12 teams, if that affects your take on whether these positions would make a mess of the competition or on the waivers or something.

 

I know my thinking behind positions won't affect how they're ultimately filled (eg players in the F slot could easily be quicker with less length SFs), but I'm hoping they might overall limit the fantasy roster construction a bit to sort of match various modern-day NBA roles and the modern NBA rotation as I imagine ...so... when I was making the above set-up, this is how I was thinking about it:

Set Runner/Handler-Initiator 1 (PG)

Set Runner/Handler-Initiator Backup (PG)

 

Quicker Wing/Secondary Handler-Initiator (SG)

 

Hybrid/Quicker Wing 1 (SG/SF)

Hybrid/Quicker Wing 2 (SG/SF)

 

Hybrid/Lengthier Wing (F)

 

Lengthier/Small-Ball-Rim Wing 1 (PF)

Lengthier/Small-Ball-Rim Wing 2 (PF/C)

 

Rim Specialist (C)

 

Thanks!
Jon

Edited by lvmnz
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got no issue with your settings. I'd maybe suggest making on of your SG/SF slots just SG if you're looking to meeting the criteria you have set out. There are very few players that just have the "SF" designation that don't have "SG" designation, and this would help avoid the SF/PF players getting thrown in there. Also would give you 4 guard only slots, 4 forward/centre only slots, and 1 hybrid (SG/SF) slot, which I think creates a good balance.
 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Idoolittle said:

I've got no issue with your settings. I'd maybe suggest making on of your SG/SF slots just SG if you're looking to meeting the criteria you have set out. There are very few players that just have the "SF" designation that don't have "SG" designation, and this would help avoid the SF/PF players getting thrown in there. Also would give you 4 guard only slots, 4 forward/centre only slots, and 1 hybrid (SG/SF) slot, which I think creates a good balance.
 

 

That makes a ton of sense - especially for player pool balance. Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...