BykeINIT 122 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 This trade was just made in my h2h 12-teamer smh Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Johnny Tuttle 90 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 If they didn't cheat or collude, it's no veto. It's a game, and you are allowed to win it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SwaggyG 6 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 A little off topic. What does whir mean? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BenSimmons25 47 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 (edited) 49 minutes ago, SwaggyG said: A little off topic. What does whir mean? "Will help in return". You can link your question/topic and the OP will answer it. EDIT: I would veto it. In my league guy owning AD didnt want to trade him for my Vučević and FVV. And Oubre/Murray/Robinson together maybe arent valuable as Vučević. Edited January 14 by BenSimmons25 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SwaggyG 6 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 I can’t even post my own question yet but ya I need some help lol. I’m debating dropping wcj, diallo or maxey (considering I don’t know what maxeys value will be once the sizers are healthy) wcj is playing like a fruit cake and diallo seems like he could be a good 6th man but I don’t know if he will sustain this. I also have 4 guys injured with 3 IL spots so eventually guys will need to be dropped just don’t know who. my team: sga booker schroder holmes vucevic wcj Maxey mcollum kelvin diallo Halliburton d graham and injured I have garland. Tatum. Love and mpj Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SwaggyG 6 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 @BenSimmons25 oh and it’s a 10-teamer Quote Link to post Share on other sites
fabrar 2,432 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 1 hour ago, SwaggyG said: I can’t even post my own question yet but ya I need some help lol. I’m debating dropping wcj, diallo or maxey (considering I don’t know what maxeys value will be once the sizers are healthy) wcj is playing like a fruit cake and diallo seems like he could be a good 6th man but I don’t know if he will sustain this. I also have 4 guys injured with 3 IL spots so eventually guys will need to be dropped just don’t know who. my team: sga booker schroder holmes vucevic wcj Maxey mcollum kelvin diallo Halliburton d graham and injured I have garland. Tatum. Love and mpj It's not cool to hijack someone else's thread and ask your own questions on it. It doesn't matter if you can't post your own questions yet. Go to the player forums and contribute their until you have enough posts to ask a question here. On topic for OP: I think it's a hugely lopsided trade that's probably not veto-worthy, but borderline. I wouldn't be mad if people decided to vote against it though. AD is just that valuable, and Barnes has been pretty solid this year as well. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
runfast 19 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 The only reason this trade should even go through, is if you’re banking on AD getting hurt and missing half the season. you have every right to veto, it’s an option offered to owners, and in this specific case I would if I had my vote I do stand by a previous poster, if the trade ends up going through, you gotta live with it. If majority vetos then majority veto’s, you also have to live with it. mind helping me out ? Thanks Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SwaggyG 6 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 1 hour ago, fabrar said: It's not cool to hijack someone else's thread and ask your own questions on it. It doesn't matter if you can't post your own questions yet. Go to the player forums and contribute their until you have enough posts to ask a question here. On topic for OP: I think it's a hugely lopsided trade that's probably not veto-worthy, but borderline. I wouldn't be mad if people decided to vote against it though. AD is just that valuable, and Barnes has been pretty solid this year as well. I didnt hijack someones thread i asked a question based on his post. shortly after someone answered my question by saying if u have a question/topic they will answer in return and since i couldnt share a link i typed it. ive been contributing to discussions and i thought i was at ten already. if op has a problem im sure he can address it himself. hes not even asking for any advice, hes asking if he should veto a trade.... so irrelevant Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rotojoe 528 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 I am not a big veto guy but yes, I would veto this one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BykeINIT 122 Posted January 14 Author Share Posted January 14 39 minutes ago, SwaggyG said: I didnt hijack someones thread i asked a question based on his post. shortly after someone answered my question by saying if u have a question/topic they will answer in return and since i couldnt share a link i typed it. ive been contributing to discussions and i thought i was at ten already. if op has a problem im sure he can address it himself. hes not even asking for any advice, hes asking if he should veto a trade.... so irrelevant get out my thread son you didn’t even have the courtesy to answer my question before posting your own get wit the program or foh 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jakers247 42 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 Easy veto for me. Trading a first rounder for 3 players who are barely hovering around top 100 atm, with only two of them having top 40-50 ceilings at best. Good luck. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyTsunami 298 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 I would veto, I gave up Ben Simmons, DLo and Ayton for AD and even that trade caused controversy. help with mine? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
falconish 41 Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 Yeah the guy is effectively giving peanuts with shaky floors for a top 10 player. Veto Quote Link to post Share on other sites
c0penhagen 30 Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 Tough one. I’m not huge on vetos unless it’s obvious collusion on the side. On the other hand, one side is still allowed to win a trade. I would have to make this a value judgement on the two involved’s character if it’s a league w friends because that’s a **** trade. Public league veto that **** Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DiscoNinja33 303 Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 100% veto. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SwaggyG 6 Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 18 hours ago, BykeINIT said: get out my thread son you didn’t even have the courtesy to answer my question before posting your own get wit the program or foh Buddy veto it or dont what does it even matter, its not even worth answering. youre not even asking a legitimate question cause this has no influence on anything to do with your team. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BykeINIT 122 Posted January 15 Author Share Posted January 15 6 hours ago, SwaggyG said: Buddy veto it or dont what does it even matter, its not even worth answering. youre not even asking a legitimate question cause this has no influence on anything to do with your team. know your role and shut your mouth Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SwaggyG 6 Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 DykeINIT my role was to answer the question and i did, i told u it doesnt matter what u decide to do so rather than me doing what this forum is meant for ur asking me to shut it? which is it? am i supposed to answer ur braindead question or nah? figure it out dyke Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SwaggyG 6 Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 and what the f--- is wrong with u guys? were yall never new to this website? like how are u guys gonna be so fkn aggressive isnt this supposed to be a helpful community? @fabrar Quote Link to post Share on other sites
fabrar 2,432 Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 17 minutes ago, SwaggyG said: and what the f--- is wrong with u guys? were yall never new to this website? like how are u guys gonna be so fkn aggressive isnt this supposed to be a helpful community? @fabrar Yes, we were all new to this website, and just like you, we didn't have access to asking questions on the AC in the beginning. So, as the rules indicate, we posted on the player threads until we were able to post on the AC. The fact remains that this thread is specifically for @BykeINIT 's topic, not yours. You can answer his question but you can't ask for advice on yours. That's not how it works and that's why no one's bothered to respond seriously to your inquiry. Arguing with us isn't going to change that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BykeINIT 122 Posted January 17 Author Share Posted January 17 On 1/15/2021 at 11:44 AM, SwaggyG said: and what the f--- is wrong with u guys? were yall never new to this website? like how are u guys gonna be so fkn aggressive isnt this supposed to be a helpful community? @fabrar bad look .. man up n stop crying like a lil girl Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BykeINIT 122 Posted January 17 Author Share Posted January 17 On 1/15/2021 at 12:04 PM, fabrar said: Yes, we were all new to this website, and just like you, we didn't have access to asking questions on the AC in the beginning. So, as the rules indicate, we posted on the player threads until we were able to post on the AC. The fact remains that this thread is specifically for @BykeINIT 's topic, not yours. You can answer his question but you can't ask for advice on yours. That's not how it works and that's why no one's bothered to respond seriously to your inquiry. Arguing with us isn't going to change that. he’s also apparently still in 3rd grade.. dykeinit? really?? lmfao Quote Link to post Share on other sites
andy1234 176 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 So I came across this thread looking for Drob's fantasy outlook thread. This is a veto. I do not agree at all on "veto is only for collusion" logic. It's stupid. Obviously you don't veto because you don't like the trade, lopsided, or out of spite because you missed an opportunity. But you most certainly can and veto a trade that significantly changes the outlook of the league. This is one of those trades. Forget top 10 player. AD is top 2. He's not even giving a fourth round player in this deal. It's bad a trade and 9/10 times, its the one owner taking advantage of another usually inexperienced owner. If it went through, its whatever. But it has no business going through. As for @SwaggyG, I didn't think what he did was a big deal at first. We were all new to the site once and aren't familiar with all the rules. But we have rules here and you have to follow them. But there is absolutely no reason to be rude to other users and to try to justify something that is against the rules. You did something that isn't allowed (and happens frequently unfortunately) and tried to justify it and play the victim card. Not cool. On 1/15/2021 at 7:33 AM, SwaggyG said: Buddy veto it or dont what does it even matter, its not even worth answering. youre not even asking a legitimate question cause this has no influence on anything to do with your team. This is a perfect example. Who are you to say whether another person's question is legitimate or not? This trade, especially in a 12 team league, could make or break the league. This is as legit a question as it comes and you didn't even have the decency to answer the question to begin with. The whole point of that rule is to prevent randoms from joining, asking a question, and then just bouncing. The forum wants committed members. I try to answer people's questions, regardless if I have one pending. That's what everyone should be doing. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.