Olliemets 471 Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Both are on Waivers.. who would you rather have going forward? 10 team ESPN standard scoring points league. Position is irrelevant, could use either. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
colepenhagen 3,561 Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 tough. kantar seems to always produce when given the min but garland was top 50 overall prior to inj. no news on inj sucks so might lean kantar as a starter in kantars last stint with por. he was 16/10 on 58% in 31 games started. still kinda worried with how much cjm and lillard shoot and how nurk was. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
colepenhagen 3,561 Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Just now, colepenhagen said: tough. kantar seems to always produce when given the min but garland was top 50 overall prior to inj. no news on inj sucks so might lean kantar as a starter in kantars last stint with por. he was 16/10 on 58% in 31 games started. still kinda worried with how much cjm and lillard shoot and how nurk was. sorry he was 11/10 in 16 games 28 min with por. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gladiator888 31 Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Depend on your need but Garland looks like a real deal. I would go with him. help: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dedicated 0N3 26 Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Based on minutes and production, I would go with Garland. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
reverb 105 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Go with Garland for ROS. Nurkic will be back soon. Garland has the starting job locked in CLE. Help? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
fabrar 2,781 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 15 hours ago, reverb said: Go with Garland for ROS. Nurkic will be back soon. Garland has the starting job locked in CLE. Help? Nurkic has been ruled out for 8 weeks minimum. He's not going to be "back soon“ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rotojoe 532 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Kanter has his chance now but I expetc he will disappoint most nights. I 'd rather have Garland. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hornrimmed_rambis 2,086 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Garland and it's not close. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
andy1234 176 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Garland unless you are desperate for big stats. But even if that’s the case, you should be able to get a decent big in a trade when he gets going again. I’m not getting fooled by Kanter’s numbers. He’s nice if you need a double double guy but usually doesn’t provide much more than that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.