Bernard 31 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 I received the offer to get Garland and give away Coby. I think it is interesting. Coby not in the best form, having a hard time leading the team as a pg, but still gets the trust of his coach. Garland on his way back and had his first start last night. could really have some advice on this. Accept or not? thanks in advance! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyTsunami 303 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 I would keep Coby, he’s their only viable PG and it seems like it’s going to be that way for a while. It’s close tho. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
squidthunder 817 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 it's close - but I think I'd lean slightly to Garland. I think Drummond is on the way out, and that backcourt will be asked to do a ton 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
vecleofe 36 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 This is very close but I would lean on Coby White for Points Leagues. On category leagues, I'll probably go with Garland. Thanks for your help! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
timro 29 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Coby is the only option for the bulls and I feel like it might just be this kind of up and down season for him. I think Garland is in the better spot to get better and have the better fantasy season. Since I have both of them I'm going to watch and see what happens but if I had to pick I'd probably rather roll with Garland. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dirty Little Birdie 1,141 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Id keep Coby Bernard. It's close though. Plus, Lavine is a viable trade candidate for Chicago which would open up more usage for White. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bernard 31 Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 1 hour ago, Dirty Little Birdie said: Id keep Coby Bernard. It's close though. Plus, Lavine is a viable trade candidate for Chicago which would open up more usage for White. Think they will let Lavine go? I would be amazed. I accepted the trade... Just like Garland more as a player I guess. Better dribble and drive/shot. Fun gamble trade, let see. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
letemfly 50 Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 Garland has the higher upside between the two so I'd rather have him. Thanks for answering mine. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
c0penhagen 30 Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 I agree w your decision to grab garland. It’s pretty much a tossup for me to be honest but garland would probably be more fun to own 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ez2do4now 162 Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 19 hours ago, Bernard said: Think they will let Lavine go? I would be amazed. I accepted the trade... Just like Garland more as a player I guess. Better dribble and drive/shot. Fun gamble trade, let see. Congrats on the trade and getting Garland. I like his situation in Cleveland better with bigs down low drawing defenses and allowing Sexton and Garland more movement. Bulls on the other hand have no interior presence to free up the guards 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bernard 31 Posted January 29 Author Share Posted January 29 Thanks @ez2do4now! I'm also happy with the trade :). Hope we aren't wrong, but its a fun gamble anyway. Good luck this weekend. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bernard 31 Posted January 29 Author Share Posted January 29 6 hours ago, c0penhagen said: I agree w your decision to grab garland. It’s pretty much a tossup for me to be honest but garland would probably be more fun to own Exactly what I was thinking. Thanks for your reply. good luck this weekend :). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.